-The shared topic of the two arguments is that it has to do with matters that effect the lives of today’s young adults long term financially as well as other weighty effects.
-Their solutions do differ very much. In “Waking up and taking charge”, it’s all about young adults needing to take their stance and fight for their voice in matters that directly effect them very much. In “College Debt: Necessary Evil or Ponzi Scheme”, the solution that’s suggested is to not try to change the system that is causing the problems but rather it suggests that young adults take a different route and to abandon the ideas of the messed up college system as a whole and try trade school.
Claim: Young adults should be protesting against the financial crisises that they are inheriting
Reason: Students protesting and making a stand against the financial crisises can make a true impact in
Warrant: Young adults are manipulated into spending money they don’t have and that is wrong
Evidence: One week after a sit-in at Yale, they announces that they woudn’t expect tuition from families earning less than $45,000 a year
Counterargument: Governers and high officials won’t listen to the voices of young people
Rebuttal: With effective student activism, officials are likely to listen
Kara's Blog 